Space Hub Sutherland

Welcome to our in-depth analysis of Space Hub Sutherland, originally published January 24th, 2023 and most recently updated on October 6th, 2026 (new facts highlighted in blue). The 2023 analysis below is kept as written. Make sure to check out our mission statement and why we do what we do. Look at our New Space guide if you want explanations of terms and concepts used in our research. And follow us on X for updates.

✉️ Stay informed and receive exclusive content:

🚀 Update from October 2026

• Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) acquired the assets of Sutherland Spaceport Ltd on 25 August 2026 from the liquidators. The Orbex subsidiary had been wound up in June 2026. The site is incomplete. There is no private launch operator in place. (Source: HIE, 25 Aug 2026; Companies House.)
• Construction that began in May 2023 was paused in December 2024 when Orbex moved its first-launch plan to SaxaVord Spaceport. Orbex entered administration on 18 February 2026. Omnidea bought Forres manufacturing assets on 30 September 2026. That deal did not include Sutherland. (Sources: BBC / Orbex Dec 2024; Companies House / FRP; European Spaceflight 2 Oct 2026.)
• Public money for the spaceport build, as HIE stated it in mid-2023: about £14.6 million (HIE and Scottish Government £9.1 million, including a £6.5 million HIE grant to Orbex; UK Space Agency £2.55 million; Nuclear Decommissioning Authority £3 million). The early 2018 board plan had been £17.3 million with an HIE share of £9.8 million. Orbex talked about £20 million of private money. Filed accounts for Sutherland Spaceport Ltd show £2.92 million owed to the parent at 31 December 2023. Administrators later put the intercompany debt owed by SSL at about £7.7 million. That is not £20 million spent on the pad. (Sources: HIE blog 27 Jun 2023; HIE PR 5 May 2023; SSL accounts YE2023; FRP AM10.)
• On the ground, what the filings support: a floating access road of about 2.5 km. SSL’s YE2023 accounts booked £1.51 million of self-constructed assets under the label “Road infrastructure”. After the HIE buy-back, HIE’s David Oxley described a pad, hardstanding, and power and communications as well. The Launch Operations Control Centre and Launch Site Integration Facility are not complete. Melness Crofters Estate says the site is not fully finished.
• A CAA FOI answer states that a spaceport licence application for Sutherland had not been made and that no Assessment of Environmental Effects had been received. Zero orbital launches have taken place from Sutherland. SaxaVord holds a CAA spaceport licence (15 December 2023) and launch-operator licences for tenants. As of 6 October 2026 SaxaVord also still had zero orbital launches after the RFA ONE attempt window was postponed.
• Orbex, the intended exclusive operator, had raised £138.5 million in total by administration, of which £76.7 million was public money, and delivered zero orbital launches. Full numbers on our Orbex review and 2026 Update on Orbex.

What you should know about Space Hub Sutherland

The Sutherland Space Hub: A project to establish a spaceport

Space Hub Sutherland is a government-led project by Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) to develop a launch site in northern Scotland. It is one of two Scottish vertical-launch projects. The other is SaxaVord Spaceport.

The planning envelope allows up to 12 launches per year for micro-class vehicles up to about 20 meters. From November 2022, Orbex was the contracted party to oversee construction, manage the site and launch Orbex Prime from Sutherland. That arrangement did not survive. Construction paused in December 2024. Orbex entered administration in February 2026. Sutherland Spaceport Ltd was liquidated in June 2026. HIE acquired the assets in August 2026. As of October 2026 there have been no orbital launches from the site, and a CAA spaceport licence application had not been filed.

The Sutherland Space Hub has been a project in development since around 2016. Initially, interest from the US aerospace corporate Lockheed Martin as well as the UK Space Agency’s initiative to establish a launch site on UK soil were driving reasons behind the program.

A history of the Space Hub Sutherland

Background on the Space Hub Sutherland

The location of the launch site in northern Scotland was scouted as early as 2016 by the HIE. The HIE, Highlands and Islands Enterprise, is a government agency with the goal of economic development in the Scottish highlands and islands.

In July 2018, the UK government officially announced funding for a consortium of space companies and projects to develop a national launch program. The consortium consisted of

• Orbex, a newspace company, who received GBP 5.5 million to develop a launcher,
• Lockheed Martin, who were awarded GBP 23.5 million, also to develop a launch vehicle, and
• HIE, who were granted GBP 2.5 million to build a spaceport in Sutherland.

HIE began planning the spaceport with the help of Orbex and Lockheed as their key partners, established a potential launch site in A’ Mhòine, and began drafting funding requirements. GBP 17.3 million would be needed to realize the infrastructure project.

The HIE established their proposal, went through committees and did their due diligence on the potential launch site. A non-public business plan was finally prepared in March 2020. In this time, however, Lockheed slowly pulled out of Sutherland and committed to the much larger project in SaxaVord in August 2020.

What didn’t help Sutherland either was local opposition, including a judicial objection by Wildland Ltd. in November 2020, a company belonging to Anders Holch Povlsen, a Danish billionaire and one of Scotland’s largest land-owners. Povlsen is, coincidentally, also the largest investor in the SaxaVord Spaceport through his Wild Ventures vehicle, supporting the project that will launch rockets far away from his own property. To give context, Povlsen, as well as other entities such as Scottish Natural Heritage, have been in opposition of the Sutherland site since at least 2018, so objections were expected. They were overruled in favor of Sutherland in July 2021, but it came with several planning conditions.

After around 15 months of silence, in November 2022, HIE appointed the only remaining potential launch partner, Orbex, as operator and manager of the launch port. Orbex will also oversee construction, which it will subcontract to Jacobs, a US-based engineering group, who is also an investor in Orbex. Construction on the site started in May 2023 (HIE groundbreaking). The plan at the time was roughly ten months of main works plus further fit-out, with initial operational capability aimed at the second half of 2024.

(Update October 2026.) Orbex paused construction in December 2024 and said first launches would go to SaxaVord instead, with a later claim that Sutherland capacity would be needed from 2028 (restart 2027). Press at the pause described a floating road across peatland without launch facilities. Orbex entered administration on 18 February 2026. Sutherland Spaceport Ltd (SC682509, formerly Forres Newco Ltd) went into compulsory liquidation in June 2026. On 25 August 2026 HIE acquired SSL’s assets from liquidators Chad Griffin and Graham Smith of FRP Advisory. Melness Crofters Estate remains the community landowner. Omnidea’s purchase of Orbex Forres assets on 30 September 2026 did not include Sutherland.

Space Hub Sutherland vs. SaxaVord Spaceport: Why are there two?

There is currently not a single active orbital spaceport in use in Europe, yet there are two under construction in Scotland. Why is this the case? To understand Sutherland, one has to understand the SaxaVord spaceport in the Shetland Islands. 3 key points to understand the history behind the battle for the best spaceport in the UK:

1. History: The Sutherland project “came first” and got started several years before the Shetland spaceport. Using time as its advantage, it was able to receive the initial GBP 2.5 million in funding from the UKSA, basically establishing it as a fixture for HIE (the funding was about 3% of the HIE’s yearly budget at the time). SaxaVord, who also tried to apply, were basically “too late”, in the words of SaxaVord COO Scott Hammond.
2. Location: Shetland Space Centre (now: SaxaVord) is much better positioned from a perspective of potential orbits, as shown in the SCEPTRE report. They also have much better (existing) infrastructure, due to the local oil & gas industry, as well as the military and airport installations on the island.
3. Lockheed: The UK’s national pathfinder project was awarded to Lockheed. Lockheed has shown interest in Sutherland early on (and Sutherland was very keen to mention them as partner up until about late 2019), but moved to SaxaVord in August 2020. The reasons aren’t official, but apparently the launch site was too small for Lockheed. Having been awarded GBP 23.5 million from the government, Lockheed needed a small launch partner to execute. Government documents show that initially, Lockheed tried to use Rocket Lab as early as 2018 (Rocket Lab’s “Electron” rocket is only 18 meters), then potentially Firefly Aerospace, who were the benchmark for the SCEPTRE report, and then finally ABL with their RS1 rocket. The RS1 rocket, however, is too big for Sutherland.

Accessible orbits and launch corridor for launches from Sutherland (left) and SaxaVord (right)

The Launch Site: What Sutherland plans to build

The location of the spaceport will be in A’ Mhòine in northern Scotland. The site itself will consist of three parts connected:

• Launch Pad Complex,
• Launch Site Integration Facility (LSIF),
• Launch Operations Control Centre (LOCC).

The three launch buildings will spread out over roughly 14 acres of land that is being leased by the local Melness Crofters Estate. The control centre and the actual launch site and integration facility are connected by a ~2.5 km floating access road across peatland. That road was built by Sutherland Spaceport Ltd. SSL’s YE2023 accounts booked £1.51 million under “Road infrastructure”. The control centre and full integration facility were still incomplete as of HIE’s August 2026 acquisition.

The LOCC will be the primary building for operations and range control activities during launch. The front side will be made of glass for a direct view of the launch, while the site itself is set into the ground and covered by grass.

The LSIF is the main building for launch vehicle assembly and payload integration. It will be roughly 500 meters from the actual launch pad complex. The launch pad complex includes the pad, fuel and propellant storage as well as a lightning tower.

Images and layout of the Space Hub Sutherland

A side view of the launch site, showing the launch pad complex on the left as well as the launch site integration facility on the right-hand side.

A close-up view of the launch pad complex and locations of the pad, strong back and launch vehicle position, propellant storage as well as the access road to the pad.

3d renderings of the launch facilities and the launch operations control center, which will be roughly 2 km south of the launch pad.

Strategy and financials behind Sutherland

Since the spaceport is a government project, the funding and finances are public, though one sometimes has to look closer on what is actually happening on the ground.

In 2018, the proposed cost of the construction project was estimated by the HIE at £17.3 million. In July 2018, the UK government, through the UK Space Agency, awarded the HIE with GBP 2.5 million. HIE took this money to develop the project further. An additional GBP 5 million was being requested from the Nuclear Decommissioning Agency (NDA) who haven’t given the official go ahead, but have “given HIE a clear indication of willingness to invest”, at least back in 2019. The NDA is involved because in the 2030s, the Dounreay Nuclear Power Development Establishment is set to enter its interim state, with significant job loss in engineering expected.

Up until November 2022, when Orbex was announced as official overseer and planner of the launch site, HIE was on the hook for the funding of £9.8 million. Now, Orbex has announced that they expect to invest about GBP 20 million of private investments into the project. This will come either directly, or through subcontracting with Orbex’s partner and investor, Jacobs.

An overview of funding and finances that have so far been confirmed

• £2.5 million granted from the UKSA (July 2021)
• £10 million committed from the HIE (as of November 2021)
• £20 million expected private investments in the future (November 2022)

(Update October 2026: figures as HIE and Companies House stated them.)

• UK Space Agency: £2.55 million (2018 award, restated May/June 2023).
• HIE and Scottish Government: £9.1 million in total, including a £6.5 million HIE grant to Orbex for spaceport development (HIE blog, 27 June 2023).
• Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: £3 million (confirmed May 2023; earlier plan had spoken of £5 million).
• Package total as stated by HIE in mid-2023: about £14.6 million.
• Private investment: Orbex and partners spoke of about £20 million (November 2022). Sutherland Spaceport Ltd’s filed accounts for the year ended 31 December 2023 show £2.92 million owed to the parent and £1.51 million of road infrastructure on the balance sheet. Administrators later put the intercompany debt due by SSL at about £7.7 million. We have not seen a filed confirmation that £20 million of private cash was spent on a finished pad.
• In December 2024, when construction paused, Orbex said public investment in the project “only amounts to £2.3 million”. That sits next to HIE’s £14.6 million package figure from 2023.
• Early 2018 board plan for comparison: £17.3 million total, of which HIE £9.8 million, UKSA £2.5 million, NDA £5 million expected.

Considering this has been a fully public project, it is nevertheless quite difficult to figure out the actual cost and investments by the parties involved so far.

Business and financials: A lot of guesswork and some question marks

Time for some back of the napkin calculations, how this spaceport could operate. From the economic impact touted, there will be “up to 40 jobs” created. We assume maximum capacity in 2030 with a ramp-up from 25 employees. We’ll assume £35,000 + 20% for personnel expenses on average. Considering the specialized nature of the jobs, the salary estimate is very conservative. We will add about £1,000,000 for yearly upkeep. Again, a number more on the lower boundary.

We could not find revenue or income projections in any of the reports. We assume that the only source of income will be the launches. We know that payloads are limited up to 500 kg. We also know that ramp-up will be slow, as stated by the HIE officials, with one launch in the first, maybe two in the second year, up to a maximum of 12 by 2030.

Going with the SCEPTRE report, ground-support costs launch providers between £300,000 – £500,000 per launch. We’ll go with £400,000 per launch for Sutherland. Putting everything together:

With an investment of around £30 million in total – 10 million from the UK government and 20 million from the private sector – we theoretically have a business case in which the project could turn a profit by 2027 and earn roundabout 2 million per year by 2030. That would amortize the initial investment after about 15 years. In our opinion: absolute best case scenario.

(Update October 2026.) The first-launch slip did not stop at 2024. Construction paused in December 2024. Orbex talked about 2028 for Sutherland capacity, then entered administration. HIE now owns an incomplete site built around a peatland road. Still zero orbital launches.

A few caveats:

1. Looking at the finances, average salary and upkeep are probably understated, while pure revenue is overstated. More launches cost more money. Looking at financial records for Andøya Space Center in Norway, average cost per salary is around £100,000 per year, and upkeep much higher, even for a highly established sub-orbital launch base.
2. In terms of risks, everything in Sutherland has to be built from scratch. All other European launch platforms have existing infrastructure or related industries: Andøya in Norway has been launching rockets since 1962. ESRANGE in Sweden has extensive test facilities used by RFA, Isar, Ariane and others for years. Even SaxaVord, building a brand-new range, has existing industrial and military infrastructure, a local airport and is already being used as a test site. Sutherland will be in the middle of nowhere, with no other purpose than as a launch site.
3. Timeline: The first launch has been postponed from 2019 to 2020, to 2021, to 2022, to 2023 and – you guessed it, to 2024 now. A successful launch is closer to 2025. There’s also the issue that there’s an inherent lack of launch candidates, other than Orbex themselves, who have yet to prove that they are capable of reaching orbit.

2023 – 2026: from groundbreaking to HIE buy-back

May 2023: HIE and Orbex break ground. Public package stated at about £14.6 million. Jacobs named as constructor. Fifty-year sub-lease in place via Sutherland Spaceport Ltd.

December 2024: Orbex pauses the build and says first Prime launches will go from SaxaVord, with a later line that Sutherland would be needed from 2028. Contemporary reporting described a floating road without launch facilities. First Minister John Swinney told Parliament he would look at how public money committed to the project stood.

18 February 2026: Orbital Express Launch Ltd enters administration. Administrators report £138.5 million raised in total and £76.7 million of public investment, with zero orbital launches. See our Orbex review.

June 2026: Sutherland Spaceport Ltd goes into compulsory liquidation.

25 August 2026: HIE acquires SSL’s assets (lease interest, related IP, infrastructure). Melness Crofters Estate welcomes the move and notes rental income already funded community projects, while the spaceport itself is still not fully complete.

30 September 2026: Omnidea completes a purchase of Orbex Forres manufacturing assets, IP and brand. Sutherland is not in that deal.

6 October 2026: CAA FOI material states a spaceport licence application for Sutherland had not been made. Zero orbital launches from Sutherland. SaxaVord is licensed, has launch-operator licences for tenants, and is still at zero orbital flights after the 2026 RFA ONE window was postponed.

Public money in, promised vs delivered

My opinion on Space Hub Sutherland and why you should keep an eye on them

What I like about Space Hub Sutherland

• It’s something: Scotland will get another spaceport, which should bring more attention to the NewSpace economy overall. The concepts of the viewing and control room, almost fully laid into the ground, are quite pretty, too. This is also going to be the greenest spaceport in the world, which, considering size, funding amounts, time invested, is, well, like I said, it’s something.

What I don’t like about Space Hub Sutherland

• “Old Space”: 8 years and almost £10 million later, construction might start soon and rockets might launch next year. The development strategy, created by the very people responsible for making this happen, shows massive risks and inherent weaknesses compared to competitors. Neither aerospace infrastructure, nor large manufacturing hubs are closeby to access talent and resources. Unfortunately, this has a lot of the signs of an “old space” approach where plans and hopes do not follow numbers.
  
  (Update October 2026.) Make that closer to thirteen years from the first scouting, about £14.6 million of public package money as HIE stated it in 2023, a road across peatland, no spaceport licence application filed, no launches, and the development agency buying the failed SPV’s assets back. The 2023 reading still holds.

Things to keep an eye out for

• Orbex (2023 view, kept): The Sutherland spaceport is now basically an extension of Orbex. Everything that happens at Orbex will decide the fate of Sutherland. Orbex will need a launch license, and they will need a spaceport license. They will need a team for launches, and a team for the spaceport. Let’s just hope the Prime rocket works.
  
  (Update October 2026.) That dependency played out. Orbex paused the pad, moved the first-launch plan to SaxaVord, entered administration, and lost the SPV. HIE owns the incomplete assets. A spaceport licence application had not been filed. Prime still has not reached orbit. The hope in the last sentence is still the right test.

Closing words: The original history of Sutherland Space Hub

If you’ve made it this far into our analysis, we want to say thanks for sticking with us for so long with some pristine quotes from the HIE:

Let us see what the next years will bring for Sutherland. We will close our analysis with a quote from Scott Hammond, COO of SaxaVord spaceport:

“The infrastructure is quite simple. It is a concrete pad with a shed, effectively. The complicated bit is airspace, international agreements, regulation, safety analysis, et cetera. That is the complicated bit, and that is what takes up a lot of the time. Building a concrete pad is relatively simple.”

Scott Hammond

More information and further reading on Space Hub Sutherland

• Read the UK’s “Space Cluster Development Strategy” and their larger plans for Sutherland and the area
• Read the transcript of the Hearing on the UK Space Strategy, including testimonies from Pete Guthrie (Space Hub Sutherland), Scott Hammond (SaxaVord Spaceport), Melissa Thorpe (Spaceport Cornwall), as well as Dan Hart (Virgin Orbit) and others

Interested in more space companies? Read our other reviews and analysis

• 
  2026 Update on Orbex
  Orbex entered administration in February 2026 after raising GBP 138.5 million, of which GBP 76.7 million was public money, and never launching. Omnidea bought the Forres assets in September 2026.
• 
  Etlaq Spaceport
  Etlaq Spaceport in Duqm is Oman’s commercial launch site under NASCOM. Ownership, Duqm-1, Karman X1, PLD and Latitude instruments, CAD 5-01, and how Duqm sits next to Andøya, SaxaVord and Kourou.
• 
  2026 Update on PLD Space
  PLD Space has still not reached orbit as of October 2026. MIURA 1 flew in 2023; MIURA 5 is aimed at H1 2027. Series C €288m, ESA ELC €158.9m, and filed 2025 accounts show €0.65m sales against €89m capitalised development that was never impaired while launch dates rolled forward.
• 
  2026 Update on Latitude
  2026 update on Latitude: still no flight, Series B EUR 27 million, Oman Etlaq LoI for an experimental late-2027 inaugural that we treat as optimistic, and no ESA European Launcher Challenge shortlist.
• 
  2026 Update on Rocket Factory Augsburg
  RFA One has not flown as of October 2026. After the August 2024 stage loss and a cancelled summer 2026 SaxaVord window, ESA signed a EUR 186.9 million Launcher Challenge contract. KKR’s EUR 30 million convertible and filed headcount round out the update.